Hollywood giants Disney and Universal Pictures have filed a lawsuit against artificial intelligence company Midjourney, alleging that its image generation tool constitutes a “bottomless pit of plagiarism.” The complaint, lodged in federal district court in Los Angeles, emphasizes that Midjourney’s technology has produced “innumerable” images resembling iconic characters, including Darth Vader from “Star Wars,” Elsa from “Frozen,” and characters from the “Despicable Me” franchise.
Details of the Lawsuit
The lawsuit claims that Midjourney’s generator produces numerous unauthorized copies of copyrighted characters. Examples cited in the complaint include images of Disney characters like Yoda, Spider-Man, and Hulk. Disney’s Chief Legal Officer Horacio Gutierrez remarked, “We are optimistic about how AI can be used responsibly as a tool to further human creativity. But piracy is piracy, and the fact that it’s done by an AI company does not make it any less infringing.”
Midjourney reportedly generated approximately $300 million in revenue last year and is planning to launch a “soon-to-be-released video service.” This financial aspect adds further tension to the allegations, suggesting significant commercial advantages derived from alleged copyright violations.
Legal Perspectives on AI and Copyright
Experts in intellectual property law are weighing in on the potential ramifications of this lawsuit. Shubha Ghosh, a law professor at Syracuse University, noted that many of the images produced by Midjourney appear to be direct copies of existing characters, albeit placed in different contexts or backgrounds. “It doesn’t seem like they’re being transformed in a creative or imaginative way,” he stated. Ghosh emphasized that copyright law allows for creativity based on existing works, provided it introduces something new.
Randy McCarthy, head of the Intellectual Property Law Group at U.S. law firm Hall Estill, added that while the case is complex, it highlights several issues surrounding Midjourney’s terms of service and fair use doctrines that the court will need to navigate. “No litigation is ever a slam dunk,” he remarked, underlining the uncertain judicial landscape surrounding AI-generated content.
Midjourney’s Position
As of now, Midjourney has not publicly responded to requests for comment regarding the lawsuit. The San Francisco-based startup, which operates with a small, self-funded team of fewer than a dozen staff, identifies itself as an “independent research lab.” Midjourney was founded by David Holz, who previously launched Leap Motion, a hardware sensor company. Notable consultants for Midjourney include former GitHub CEO Nat Friedman and Philip Rosedale, the creator of Second Life.
The Broader Context of AI in Hollywood
This lawsuit occurs against the backdrop of an ongoing debate in Hollywood about the role of AI in the creative industries. Two years prior, actors and writers in the entertainment sector staged significant strikes, seeking protections against the encroachment of new technologies, including AI. However, the adoption of artificial intelligence in film and television has since expanded, with AI tools used in notable projects, including recent Oscar contenders that employed AI to modify actors’ voices.
AI technologies have also been utilized for visual effects, such as digitally de-aging legendary actors like Tom Hanks and Harrison Ford. This duality in perception—both promising and perilous—reflects the complicated relationship that the entertainment industry is forging with the rapidly evolving world of artificial intelligence.
As the judicial process unfolds, the implications of this case could further define the intersection of creativity and technology in a sector increasingly shaped by AI innovations.
Pour plus de Nouvelles d'affaires, vérifier PGN Business Insider.
