Five Key Facts About the Fire That Closed Heathrow

London, 30 June 2025 — A recent investigation into the devastating fire at a key electricity substation that plunged Heathrow Airport into near-total darkness, forcing its closure and stranding over 200,000 passengers, has revealed critical failures in maintenance and communication stretching back more than seven years. The National Energy System Operator (NESO) report, published this week, details the causes of the fire and highlights systemic vulnerabilities in the power supply infrastructure supporting the UK’s busiest airport.

Fire Triggered by Moisture-Induced Transformer Failure

The NESO inquiry identified that the blaze originated in a “supergrid transformer” at the North Hyde substation, a pivotal facility that steps down high-voltage electricity from the national transmission grid to levels suitable for Heathrow Airport and surrounding communities.

According to NESO, the immediate cause was moisture invading the transformer’s high-voltage “bushing” insulation, leading to an electrical short-circuit and intense arcing sparks similar to those in a spark plug. This electrical failure precipitated a catastrophic malfunction, igniting the oil used to cool the transformer and rendering two transformers inoperative. The resulting power cut severed Heathrow’s electrical supply, forcing an airport-wide shutdown that lasted nearly 24 hours.

“Moisture ingress in high-voltage equipment can cause insulation failure, which is a known and preventable risk,” said Dr. Helen Morrison, an electrical engineering specialist at Imperial College London. “In this case, it sparked a chain reaction that critically disrupted essential power infrastructure.”

Longstanding Warnings Ignored: Signs Detected Seven Years Earlier

The report underscores a troubling history of deferred maintenance. Signs of moisture were first detected at the North Hyde substation as early as July 2018. At the time, National Grid the operator responsible for maintaining the substation classified the issue as an “imminent fault” requiring urgent replacement.

However, maintenance actions were postponed repeatedly. In 2022, routine upkeep on the transformer was deferred, and attempts to reschedule this essential work failed to materialize. NESO’s findings suggest that despite clear indicators of deterioration, the problem was neither adequately addressed nor prioritized.

“Preventive maintenance in power infrastructure is fundamental to ensuring reliability, especially for critical sites like airports,” stated James O’Connor, senior analyst at the UK Energy Research Centre. “By neglecting early warning signs, operators allowed conditions to deteriorate to crisis point.”

Heathrow’s Vulnerability: Three Grid Connections, One Weak Link

Heathrow Airport consumes power equivalent to a small city and maintains three separate grid connections to safeguard its energy supply. Nevertheless, the report reveals that any single failure among these connections would necessitate a full airport shutdown lasting 10 to 12 hours while systems were rerouted.

Despite understanding this vulnerability, Heathrow had previously deemed the estimated £1 billion investment required to bolster resilience as unjustifiable, given the low perceived risk of a total outage. NESO noted that while multiple supply routes exist, opportunities remain to enhance their redundancy and robustness.

“The decision to accept risk based on cost considerations reflects a wider trend in critical infrastructure management,” comments Sarah Harper, an infrastructure risk advisor. “However, the cost both financial and reputational of the Heathrow outage now casts that calculation in a new light.”

Communication Failures: National Grid Unaware of Critical Consequences

NESO’s review also highlighted significant gaps in awareness. Although National Grid and the local Distribution Network Operator, SSEN, understood that North Hyde supplied power to Heathrow Airport, they were unaware that a supply interruption would compel a full airport closure.

Currently, energy suppliers lack systematic access to data on whether their customers operate as “critical national infrastructure” (CNI) facilities whose operation is vital to national security, transport, government, or emergency services. The report calls for improved coordination and data sharing between CNI operators and energy providers to prevent future disruptions.

“The absence of clear communication channels between infrastructure operators leads to underestimated risks,” stated Professor Michael Turner, a governance expert at the University of Oxford. “Designating and flagging critical customers must become an integral part of energy management.”

Heathrow’s Response and Legal Considerations

Heathrow Airport has expressed strong dissatisfaction with the report’s findings. The airport operator criticized what it describes as “clear and repeated failings” on National Grid’s part which “could and should have prevented” the fire and subsequent shutdown.

The airport is reportedly exploring legal action to hold National Grid accountable for the incident, which profoundly damaged its operations and passenger confidence. Heathrow’s Chief Executive, Thomas Woldbye, who was not personally involved in the decision to close the airport during the early hours of the fire, has called for National Grid to accept responsibility and improve infrastructure maintenance standards.

In response, National Grid has defended its maintenance regime as comprehensive and pledged to cooperate fully with ongoing investigations, including Ofgem’s regulatory inquiry into the incident.

Broader Implications and Future Outlook

The 2024 Heathrow blackout spotlighted the critical dependence of key national infrastructure on reliable electricity supply, and underscored vulnerabilities in how maintenance and risk assessments are conducted within the UK’s energy networks.

According to data from the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy (BEIS), the transport sector accounts for approximately 25% of electricity consumption among CNI facilities. A failure in power supply to major hubs like Heathrow holds cascading risks for the economy, public safety, and international connectivity.

Following the incident, government officials have announced plans to review regulations governing electricity supply to CNI sites, aiming to mandate enhanced resilience measures and improve transparency between energy companies and critical operators.

“Integrating robust safeguards into our power network is no longer optional but necessary,” said Energy Minister Claire Watt. “The Heathrow event is a call to action to fortify the backbone of our national infrastructure.”

Conclusión

The NESO report reveals a complex web of technical failures, deferred maintenance, and communication breakdowns that culminated in Heathrow’s unprecedented power outage and closure. The incident serves as a stark reminder of the importance of proactive infrastructure management and inter-agency collaboration to safeguard critical services.

As investigations proceed and stakeholders deliberate on accountability and reforms, the airport’s experience is likely to inform future policies aimed at bolstering the resilience and reliability of the UK’s vital energy networks.

For more detailed analysis and ongoing coverage of US labor markets, trade policies, UK government, finances and markets stay tuned to  PGN Business Insider.